Compensation for damage caused by a criminal offense as a condition for implementing a criminal procedural compromise

Until recently, the resolution of conflict between state and criminal with use punitive measures was main means combating crime. The process humanizing procedural legislation Ukraine fundamentally changed situation caused need to improve form, introduce new institutions, functioning which will ensure protection interests society state.This reason why subjects had opportunity resolve legal by reaching a compromise concluding an agreement. corresponding norms were established Criminal Procedure Code Ukraine. goal such innovations is simplify court procedure efficiency law enforcement agencies.The analysis statistical data shows active in practical activities agencies positive impact on settling conflicts proceedings.But, despite success popularity this institute, there are still number problematic issues, emergence due operate not only legislation, but also other branches - civil, civil procedural. We came conclusion that legislative provisions specified normative acts sometimes inconsistent, contradictory require detailed regulation legislation. inconsistent contradictory. This fully applies issues compensation for damage victim offense, one conditions implementation compromise. Unfortunately, until now, neither Civil, nor Civil Procedure, Codes Ukraine, operating concept “damage”, do even establish its essence. causes difficulties enforcement. In practice, “damage” often identified others, as “damages”, “losses”, etc.But key defining, it provides understanding specifics specific function process, activity whose rights have been violated illegal encroachment their representatives. line aimed at restoring (material, non-material), or state. justifies relevance study